{"id":492,"date":"2026-09-15T08:02:33","date_gmt":"2026-09-15T08:02:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/identify-unknown-feeder-breaker-chain\/"},"modified":"2026-09-16T06:27:46","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T06:27:46","slug":"identify-unknown-feeder-breaker-chain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/identify-unknown-feeder-breaker-chain\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Identify an Unknown Feeder Breaker Chain Without a Part Number"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

An unreadable or missing part number is common on long-serving mining equipment. Paint, wear, repairs, supplier changes, and undocumented replacement cycles can leave a maintenance team with an installed feeder breaker chain that has no trustworthy identity. The wrong response is to choose the nearest listed model from one visible dimension. The stronger response is to build an identification record from independent pieces of evidence.<\/p>\n

The process starts with the machine and application, then moves through pitch, repeating unit length, flight spacing, scraper width, chain-section structure, flight attachment, pins and retention, markings, and controlled historical documents. Each item either narrows the candidate set or reveals a discrepancy that must remain open. A model name is the conclusion of that process, not the starting assumption.<\/p>\n

K201B and K207B are useful examples because they share nominal 3 1\/2 inch pitch and a 21 inch repeating unit yet differ in scraper width and detailed component structure. If an unknown chain were identified from pitch alone, those two listed models could not be separated.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Identify the machine<\/h3>\n

Confirm feeder breaker application, chain location, strand count, travel direction, and any machine\/drawing identifiers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Build the geometry fingerprint<\/h3>\n

Record pitch, repeating unit, flight spacing, scraper width, chain and attachment structure, and visible markings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Preserve uncertainty<\/h3>\n

If evidence conflicts, keep the model candidate status open and request drawing or sample review rather than forcing a match.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

1. Prove the Application Before Comparing Chain Models<\/h2>\n

Start with the machine. Photograph the feeder breaker or chain-conveyor context, identify inlet\/discharge orientation where known, and record which strand or side is being inspected. If the plant also operates shuttle cars or bolter miners, this step is essential because K Series chains exist for more than one underground mining application.<\/p>\n

Machine context does not prove the exact chain model, but it eliminates an important class of routing errors. A chain removed from a feeder breaker should not be catalogued as a shuttle-car chain because one link looks similar, and a photograph of a loose spare should not be assumed to belong to the nearest machine without traceability.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

2. Measure Pitch as the First Geometric Filter<\/h2>\n
\"zincir<\/figure>\n

Use equivalent joint references and span multiple pitch intervals where safe access permits. Record the raw span, pitch count, location, tool, unit, and photographs. Keep the field result separate from nominal pitch values in candidate drawings.<\/p>\n

Pitch is a family filter, not a unique identifier. If the chain appears close to 3 1\/2 inches, both K201B and K207B remain possible examples on this site, and other configurations may also exist. Continue the identification sequence.<\/p>\n

\u0130lgili teknik sayfa: replacement feeder breaker chain identification workflow<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

3. Document the Repeating Unit and Flight Pattern<\/h2>\n

Trace the chain until the structural pattern repeats. Count Chain Sections, Flight Sections, special attachments, and the number of pitch intervals between equivalent flights. Mark one reference flight and photograph a complete repeat. Measure unit length between equivalent datums.<\/p>\n

For K201B and K207B, the documented repeat is one Flight Section and two Chain Sections with a 21 inch unit length. If an unknown chain presents a different sequence, that difference is more important than a close pitch reading.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

4. Measure Scraper Width from Defined Faces<\/h2>\n

Choose an intact flight if possible and define exactly which faces or edges form the width dimension. Record several flights when wear is uneven. Separate observed remaining width from nominal drawing width.<\/p>\n

The K201B width is 44 2\/5 inches (1127.5 mm) and K207B is 46 inches (1171.85 mm). Those values help separate candidate models only when the field measurement uses comparable reference geometry.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

5. Build a Component and Attachment Fingerprint<\/h2>\n
\"3<\/figure>\n

Photograph outer and inner links, plates, pin\/bush joints, attachment links, extended pins, T-pins or spring pins, scraper head\/plate relationships, and retention features. Include a wide view tying each detail to the repeating unit.<\/p>\n

Component evidence can resolve candidates that share broad dimensions. K207B documents a Scraper Outer Link and Extended Pin, while K201B documents its own Locating Bush and Spring Pin arrangement. Treat those as supporting clues, not as permission to assign a model from one part.<\/p>\n

\u0130lgili teknik sayfa: feeder breaker chain model family<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

6. Search for Markings but Verify What They Belong To<\/h2>\n

Inspect chain plates, scraper components, tags, old spares, machine records, and removed sections for readable identifiers. Photograph the marking close-up and then photograph its location. A number becomes trustworthy only when its relationship to the installed chain is clear.<\/p>\n

If two markings conflict, retain both. One may be a component code, old maintenance mark, machine identifier, or a part from a repair. The geometry and document trail must decide which marking controls.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

7. Compare with Old Drawings and Purchase Records<\/h2>\n
\"k201b<\/figure>\n

Collect drawings, previous purchase orders, inspection sheets, supplier confirmations, and maintenance notes that can be tied to the same machine. Check revision, date, and whether the record describes the complete chain or one component. Do not assume the newest file on a shared drive is the installed configuration.<\/p>\n

Create a field-by-field comparison: pitch, unit length, width, flight arrangement, component clues, and markings. Mark each as agreement, conflict, or not verified. That matrix turns scattered historical documents into controlled identification evidence.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Unknown feeder breaker chain identification matrix<\/caption>\n
Evidence field<\/th>\nRecord<\/th>\nDecision use<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Ba\u015fvuru<\/th>\nFeeder breaker machine, side\/strand, location<\/td>\nPrevents routing to another mining-chain application.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Saha<\/th>\nRaw multi-pitch span and observed\/nominal comparison<\/td>\nNarrows candidate families.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Repeating unit<\/th>\nUnit length plus chain\/flight sequence<\/td>\nSeparates chains with the same pitch.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Kaz\u0131y\u0131c\u0131 geni\u015fli\u011fi<\/th>\nDefined endpoints on intact\/best flight<\/td>\nDistinguishes listed configurations.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Flight spacing<\/th>\nDatum, interval count, pattern map<\/td>\nConfirms conveyor arrangement.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Component fingerprint<\/th>\nLinks, pins\/bushes, attachment and retention details<\/td>\nAdds model-specific structural evidence.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Markings<\/th>\nReadable code plus location context<\/td>\nSupports identity when traceable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Documents<\/th>\nDrawing\/order revision and machine relationship<\/td>\nControls historical evidence.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n
Kay\u0131t kural\u0131<\/th>\nDo not promote a candidate to confirmed status until the key dimensions, structure, and machine\/document evidence are consistent.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tfoot>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n

8. Use Damage and Repair History as Context, Not Original Geometry<\/h2>\n

A repaired flight, replacement link, welded plate, or mixed chain section can make the installed chain differ from its original design. Record repairs and measure intact areas separately. Do not copy a field repair into a replacement specification unless engineering has approved it as the required configuration.<\/p>\n

If every available unit is damaged, a removed sample and old drawing may be needed to reconstruct the original geometry. State what is measured and what is inferred; do not blend the two.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

9. Assign an Evidence Status Instead of a Premature Model Name<\/h2>\n

Use status labels such as unidentified, candidate K201B, candidate K207B, custom configuration, or confirmed model. Define what evidence would move the status forward. This is more useful than repeatedly writing a model name with a question mark.<\/p>\n

For example, a chain may match 3.5 inch pitch and 21 inch unit length but lack verified scraper width. The next action is a width and flight-interface measurement, not a purchase order. A different chain may match dimensions but show a conflicting attachment structure, triggering drawing review.<\/p>\n

\n
Unknown chain<\/dt>\n
A chain whose model or approved configuration cannot yet be supported by controlled evidence.<\/dd>\n
Candidate model<\/dt>\n
A listed model consistent with some, but not all, required identification evidence.<\/dd>\n
Configuration fingerprint<\/dt>\n
The combined pattern of dimensions, assemblies, components, and application context used to distinguish chains.<\/dd>\n
Confirmed model<\/dt>\n
A model identity supported by the required physical and documentary evidence for the procurement decision.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/section>\n
\n

10. Package the Unknown Chain as an Engineering RFQ<\/h2>\n
\"k207b<\/figure>\n

When the model cannot be confirmed, the RFQ can still be strong. Send machine\/application context, chain location, pitch record, repeating-unit sketch, scraper width, flight spacing, component photos, markings, repair history, drawing comparisons, and quantity. List open dimensions explicitly.<\/p>\n

A supplier can then quote against an approved drawing review or request the one missing piece of evidence. That is a controlled custom\/unknown-chain workflow, not a failed identification.<\/p>\n

\u0130lgili teknik sayfa: submit an unknown chain for engineering review<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Pratik Devir Teslim Kontrol Listesi<\/h2>\n

Bu devir teslim kontrol listesini kullanarak saha kayd\u0131n\u0131 kapat\u0131n. How to Identify an Unknown Feeder Breaker Chain Without a Part Number<\/strong>Ama\u00e7, ba\u015fka bir genel bak\u0131m formu olu\u015fturmak de\u011fil. Ama\u00e7, bir sonraki inceleyicinin sonucun nas\u0131l elde edildi\u011fini anlamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ihtiya\u00e7 duydu\u011fu \u00f6zel g\u00f6zlemleri, referans noktalar\u0131n\u0131 ve makine ba\u011flam\u0131n\u0131 korumakt\u0131r. Evrensel bir de\u011fer icat etmek yerine, makineye \u00f6zg\u00fc kabul limitlerini onaylanm\u0131\u015f \u00e7izim, bak\u0131m prosed\u00fcr\u00fc veya m\u00fchendislik talimat\u0131 alt\u0131nda tutmak gerekir.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Kontrol noktas\u0131<\/th>\nNe kaydedilecek?<\/th>\nKayd\u0131n nas\u0131l kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Prove the Application Before Comparing Chain Models<\/strong><\/td>\nRecord the exact machine location, strand or side, current operating\/shutdown state, and the observation that relates to prove the application before comparing chain models. Include a photograph that lets another reviewer find the same area.<\/td>\nBu, daha sonraki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmlerin makine ve zincir konumundan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u011flam\u0131 olu\u015fturur.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Measure Pitch as the First Geometric Filter<\/strong><\/td>\nCapture the physical reference used for measure pitch as the first geometric filter. Keep the raw dimension, image or marking beside the interpretation, and note any wear, repair, build-up or access limitation that could affect the reading.<\/td>\nSonucun tekrarlanabilir olmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar ve hasarl\u0131 veya k\u00f6t\u00fc tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f bir referans\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirme gereksinimi haline gelmesini \u00f6nler.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Document the Repeating Unit and Flight Pattern<\/strong><\/td>\nCross-check document the repeating unit and flight pattern against any controlled drawing, previous purchase reference or retained spare that is available. Keep current field data and historical information in separate fields when they differ.<\/td>\nSaha ko\u015fullar\u0131, ge\u00e7mi\u015f kay\u0131tlar ve nominal \u00fcr\u00fcn bilgileri tam olarak uyu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda izlenebilirli\u011fi korur.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Measure Scraper Width from Defined Faces<\/strong><\/td>\nFor measure scraper width from defined faces, state what is confirmed, what is only observed, and what still needs engineering confirmation. Attach the image or measurement that supports the statement rather than relying on a product name alone.<\/td>\nBak\u0131m, sat\u0131n alma ve tedarik\u00e7iye, \u015fu anda nelerin yap\u0131labilece\u011fini ve nelerin piyasaya s\u00fcr\u00fclmeden \u00f6nce \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6steren bir liste sunar.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Mevcut durumu, gerekli de\u011fi\u015ftirme geometrisinden ay\u0131r\u0131n.<\/strong> A worn, repaired, dirty or partially dismantled component may still be very useful for identification, but its current shape is not automatically the manufacturing requirement. Label field measurements as observed data, retain the original unit and measurement method, and identify any feature that may have been altered by service. For identify unknown feeder breaker chain, photographs should show the measurement endpoints or component relationship clearly enough that a remote reviewer can reproduce the logic.<\/p>\n

\u00c7eli\u015fkili bilgileri gizlemek yerine \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturun.<\/strong> If a drawing, old order, marking and current measurement point in different directions, keep each source visible and describe the conflict. Do not average values or silently choose the most convenient one. Use additional photographs, measurements from another intact repeating unit, machine interface information and the controlled document revision to determine which value governs. If package the unknown chain as an engineering rfq cannot be confirmed during the shutdown, state that limitation explicitly so the open question survives the handoff.<\/p>\n

Make the next action obvious for How to Identify an Unknown Feeder Breaker Chain Without a Part Number.<\/strong> Tamamlanan kay\u0131t, bak\u0131m departman\u0131na nelerin yeniden kontrol edilmesi gerekti\u011fini, sat\u0131n alma departman\u0131na hangi bilgilerin teklif talebine (RFQ) dahil edilmesi gerekti\u011fini ve m\u00fchendislik departman\u0131na hangi boyutlar\u0131n veya aray\u00fczlerin hala onaylanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini bildirmelidir. Makine tekrar hizmete girmeden \u00f6nce, dosya setinin genel bir makine g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc, eksiksiz bir tekrarlayan zincir\/kanat g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc, ilgili bile\u015fenlerin veya i\u015faretlerin yak\u0131n \u00e7ekimleri ve bu k\u0131lavuzda kullan\u0131lan boyutlar\u0131 i\u00e7erdi\u011finden emin olun. identify unknown feeder breaker chain<\/em>\u0130zlenebilir bir dizi g\u00f6zlem, veri i\u00e7ermeyen uzun bir anlat\u0131dan daha faydal\u0131d\u0131r ve bir de\u011fi\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca ses perdesi, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm veya eski bir par\u00e7a numaras\u0131na dayanarak verilmesi riskini azalt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Bu G\u00f6rev \u0130\u00e7in Saha Karar Notlar\u0131<\/h2>\n

Denetim kayd\u0131 How to Identify an Unknown Feeder Breaker Chain Without a Part Number<\/strong> Bak\u0131m durdurulduktan sonra kullan\u0131m\u0131 kolay olmal\u0131d\u0131r. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u00fc\u00e7 not, makineye \u00f6zg\u00fc bir kabul s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olu\u015fturmadan makaleyi pratik bir devir teslim haline getirir. \u00d6zellikle bak\u0131m g\u00f6zlemlerinin daha sonra m\u00fchendislik veya sat\u0131n alma taraf\u0131ndan incelenmesi gerekti\u011finde ve orijinal zincire art\u0131k eri\u015filemedi\u011finde faydal\u0131d\u0131rlar.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Confirm Prove the Application Before Comparing Chain Models<\/h3>\n

\u00d6ncelikle g\u00f6zlemin nerede ve nas\u0131l yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyin. Makineyi, zincir taraf\u0131n\u0131 veya telini, tekrarlayan \u00fcniteyi veya u\u00e7u\u015f konumunu ve kontrol yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada zincirin durumunu kaydedin. Bile\u015fen kirli, y\u00fckl\u00fc, gev\u015fek, \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, onar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f veya g\u00f6zle g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr \u015fekilde deforme olmu\u015fsa, bu durumu okuman\u0131n yan\u0131na ekleyin. Bir foto\u011fraf, ba\u015fka bir ki\u015finin ayn\u0131 yeri bulmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak kadar \u00e7evredeki yap\u0131y\u0131 i\u00e7ermelidir. Bu makale i\u00e7in ama\u00e7, ba\u011flam\u0131 korumakt\u0131r. prove the application before comparing chain models<\/strong> Onu tek bir say\u0131ya indirgemek yerine.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n

\n

Cross-check Measure Pitch as the First Geometric Filter<\/h3>\n

\u0130lk sonucu do\u011frulamak i\u00e7in ikinci bir g\u00f6zlem veya kontroll\u00fc referans kullan\u0131n. Bu, kom\u015fu, bozulmam\u0131\u015f bir tekrarlayan birim, ba\u015fka bir zincir teli, bir \u00e7izim revizyonu, daha \u00f6nceki bir sat\u0131n alma kayd\u0131 veya saklanm\u0131\u015f bir yedek par\u00e7a olabilir. Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma farkl\u0131 bir nominal gereksinim \u00f6nerse bile, orijinal alan de\u011ferini g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr tutun. \u0130ki de\u011fer uyu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, fark\u0131n neden var olabilece\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131n ve bir sonraki ad\u0131mda neyin do\u011frulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtin. Bu, \u00f6zellikle \u015fu durumlar i\u00e7in \u00f6nemlidir: measure pitch as the first geometric filter<\/strong>\u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc kullan\u0131m kaynakl\u0131 a\u015f\u0131nma, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm y\u00f6ntemi ve \u00f6nceki onar\u0131mlar, bulunan durumun de\u011fi\u015fmesine neden olabilir.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n

\n

Prepare Document the Repeating Unit and Flight Pattern for review<\/h3>\n

Sonucu uzaktan kontrol edilebilecek \u015fekilde paketleyin. Ham \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm veya g\u00f6zlemi, birimini, referans y\u00fczeylerini veya u\u00e7 noktalar\u0131n\u0131, en az bir yak\u0131n \u00e7ekim foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131 ve bir ba\u011flam foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131 ve tan\u0131mlama s\u0131ras\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan herhangi bir \u00e7izimi veya i\u015faretlemeyi ekleyin. \u00d6\u011fenin onaylanm\u0131\u015f, aday veya bilinmeyen olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtin. document the repeating unit and flight pattern<\/strong> Bir varsay\u0131ma ba\u011fl\u0131ysa, varsay\u0131m\u0131 bir spesifikasyona d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmek yerine, a\u00e7\u0131k soruyu teklif talebine (RFQ) yaz\u0131n. Teklifi alan de\u011ferlendirici, y\u00f6ntemi haf\u0131zas\u0131ndan yeniden olu\u015fturmadan zincirleme ko\u015fulu anlayabilmelidir.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n

Karar s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr halde tutun.<\/strong> Measure Scraper Width from Defined Faces may influence the next maintenance or sourcing step, but the website does not set a universal discard, tension or interchangeability limit. Use the equipment procedure, approved drawing and order-specific engineering requirements for acceptance decisions. The purpose of this record is to make the observation behind identify unknown feeder breaker chain<\/em> Yeterince izlenebilir olmas\u0131, tahmin y\u00fcr\u00fctmeye gerek kalmadan do\u011fru \u00fcr\u00fcn veya m\u00fchendislik yolunun se\u00e7ilebilmesini sa\u011flar.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Sonraki Karardan \u00d6nce \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi Gereken Sorular<\/h2>\n
\nWhat is the minimum information for an unknown-chain enquiry?<\/summary>\n

Provide machine\/application context, clear overall and detail photos, measured pitch, repeating-unit evidence, scraper width, flight spacing if accessible, component\/attachment views, and any drawings or markings.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nCan the closest listed model be used as a temporary identification?<\/summary>\n

Use it only as a candidate and state what has not been verified. Do not turn proximity into a compatibility claim or purchase specification.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhat if the chain has mixed repair sections?<\/summary>\n

Map the repairs and collect measurements from intact areas as well. A replacement section may not represent the original chain configuration.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhen is a physical sample useful?<\/summary>\n

A safely removed, traceably labelled sample is useful when photographs cannot show hidden geometry, dimensions are uncertain, or the installed chain is too damaged for reliable identification.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/section>\n

\n

Sonraki Ad\u0131m: Teknik Kayd\u0131 Kapat\u0131n<\/h2>\n

An unknown feeder breaker chain becomes manageable when identification is treated as evidence accumulation. Application, pitch, repeating unit, width, spacing, components, markings, and records each answer a different question.<\/p>\n

If the evidence converges, the model can be confirmed. If it does not, the honest output is a controlled custom or engineering-review RFQ that preserves uncertainty instead of hiding it behind the nearest part number.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Identify an unknown feeder breaker chain without a part number by combining machine context, pitch, unit length, scraper width, flight pattern.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":441,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=492"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":556,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/492\/revisions\/556"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/feederbreaker-chain.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}